Rear Window Review
I’ve never particularly considered myself a fan of “older” movies, as I am not the biggest fan of the pacing of films from the 1950’s. I’ve also seen Psycho, another Hitchcock staple, and then too did I dread how slowly the suspense built throughout the film. However, I still found that there is much to be appreciated in Hitchcock’s direction and overall style.
We see a variety of clear choices of patterns in Rear Window that Hitchcock makes, most distinctly with the choice to almost confine the camera to Jeff’s point of view out the window when observing the neighbors. The audience almost never gets the chance to look beyond Jefferies' view until Jefferies and Lisa hear a commotion out the window. When the audience, along with Jeff and Lisa, discover that the fire escape couple’s dog has died, the audience has the rare opportunity to veer away from the constant POV angle that the camera usually subjects to. Instead, the audience is able to actually see the characters up close and personal. No more are they faint figures across the courtyard but rather full fledged people with lives further than what Jefferies has allowed the audience to see. Not only is the change of view interesting and pleasing visually, but the break in pattern shows and leads into a technique that Hitchcock makes present in most, if not all, of his films: the plot twist.
At least in Rear Window, the audience (and Jefferies) find out that Lars Thorwald was in fact responsible for the death of his wife, but also discover that Thorwald was also responsible for the death of the dog after many pieces are put together upon Jeff and Lisa’s reflection of the past few days.
While I wasn’t the biggest fan of how the execution of the choppy ending felt, I can still appreciate the intention of the final few scenes with Hitchcock’s choice to make Jeff the one being watched rather than the person doing the watching.
Comments
Post a Comment